top of page
Scan 20.jpeg

Museums as theatres of memory

A state of perpetual wonderment and astonishment: this is the feeling that uniquely characterises childhood. The whole world is new and waiting to be discovered. My own discoveries, apart from inspecting the bottom of my wellies after traipsing through the farm where we used to live, took place in the company of a set of children’s encyclopaedias. Given to me by my family, they were often read to me; my role involved pointing at the many illustrations and photographs. More often than not however, I would sneak away alone to some corner of the room and settle down to begin my journey, examining the pictures of flora, fauna and fantastical minerals and geodes and inspecting their inscriptions.


Recreating this feeling of wonderment at the world and its marvellous inhabitants was the ambition of wealthy men in the Renaissance period. Many constructed elaborate cabinets of curiosities and wonder-rooms or Wunderkammer. These were filled with extraordinary and sometimes fake objects they had purchased or taken on their travels. Such objects included wonders of the natural world: preserved animals, horns, tusks, and minerals alongside man-made curiosities such as sculptures, tools and clothing. 


Following the cautious footsteps echoing on the cold marble steps of the entrance to the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford is perhaps the only modern day equivalent of entering a wonder-room. Case upon case of objects reverberate around the dimly lit hall and its many floors. Artefacts from across the globe are crammed next to each other, representing unique forms of human expression throughout place and time. 


This placing of unrelated objects alongside each other within a wonder-room encouraged viewers to compare and find parallels. This gave the impression of a dynamic world, endlessly transforming. This feeling is recreated at Pitt Rivers. Objects are organised into categories according to how they are used, revealing regional and historical variations and eschewing the chronological approach adopted by most other museums. This inspires a notion of interconnectedness and provokes further curiosity into the past lives of particular objects. 


This curiosity is embodied in the children that visit the museum. After jostling to hang up their coats and bags they begin their own journeys, attempting to find and identify different but interconnected objects. Later, I watch on as one teacher describes the materials such as porcupine quills, beads, scraps of cloth and animal teeth used by Native American women to decorate clothing. The children then translate this excitement and knowledge of the museum’s collections into their own objects: decorating masks and constructing their own shadow puppets. 


Alongside this curiosity and wonderment, wonder-rooms frequently had an ulterior motive: to showcase the owner’s imperial power and magnificence by displaying objects from their conquests. This can also be felt at Pitt Rivers. The faded tags that were first assigned to the objects often resemble their chequered past.


The very fragility of these objects, represented by their aged display tags, highlights the necessity of keeping them behind glass. The dim lights of the museum, whilst enhancing the treasure-like nature of the displays, are for practical reasons so as not to damage the objects. But herein lies a further problem. The price of this preservation is the relegation of these items to the past, as curios of a bygone era. When in fact, many of these objects have a present day significance as important cultural signifiers. Objects previously created to be worn, touched or used in important ceremonies now lie still. An ornately decorated moccasin designed to be placed on a baby’s foot, a gift from another member of the family, now rests on a shelf. They become passive objects, viewed but later forgotten. 


This passivity has the potential to rob objects of the stories they once told. The dangers of this are more significant now than ever with the rapid rise in the loss of traditional languages and cultures. Objects are a distinct part of this language of story telling and their removal from this context may result in the devastating loss of cultural knowledge and past experience. 

To combat this, the Pitt Rivers Museum has embarked on a number of projects aiming to reconnect objects with their cultures. The Blackfoot Shirts Project was intended to assist Blackfoot people to reaffirm this part of their heritage. Blackfoot people traditionally lived in what is now Alberta, Canada and the U.S state of Montana. The shirts range from work shirts designed to protect the body from wind and branches to beautifully fringed and decorated shirts for formal occasions. 


Despite the fragile nature of the shirts, elders, ceremonialists, artists, teachers and high school students were able to handle the shirts and learn about their history. The reactions of the Blackfoot people reveal the importance and significance of these objects, ’people of all ages gasped audibly at their beauty and power.’ ‘Some chose to speak or to sing to the shirts… Others brought gifts to honour the ancestors, or dressed in their best clothes.’ ‘Many women cried at the sight of the shirts, moved by both their beauty and by the fact they had never before had the chance to see such important heritage items’. These reactions are made all the more powerful with the knowledge that Native American people were discouraged and even banned from wearing traditional clothes under restrictive government policies. These shirts therefore have a dual meaning of not only identity but also defiance and resistance. 


The wonder-rooms of the renaissance have been described as ‘a microcosm or theatre of the world, and a memory theatre.’ Yet, in places such as the Pitt Rivers Museum these are no longer forgotten memories. By harnessing the innate qualities of childhood: curiosity, wonderment and imagination, children and adults alike are able to connect with objects, creating memories and stories of their own. 

IMG-20160317-WA0004 (1).jpg

Gardening and the creative process

When my Dad once told me that he could never have an office job, I didn’t really understand him. Of course, I knew literally what he meant; that he would find that environment stifling and unfulfilling. But figuring out what that truly meant to him took time. It involved my dad’s own efforts to imbue in me his understanding of the countryside. Endless walks with him pointing out the seeds leaves and trees that lined my small world; the farm where we lived. Treading the contents of the farm tracks back through the kitchen door to my grandmother’s dismay. 


My dad is a farmer, but first and foremost he is a gardener. For him working outside has always been more than a job. It’s been a way of life and lately, a way to help people. I found this outlook running through the words of The Little Gardener, the beautifully illustrated children’s book by Emily Hughes. Hughes’ little gardener has a similar reverence for the importance of the garden, “This was the garden. It didn’t look like much but it meant everything to his gardener. It was his home. It was his supper. It was his joy.” Except my dad’s joy isn’t just his. By tending other people’s gardens who are often unable to do so themselves due to old age or illness, he gives them some of their joy back. Sitting in the sunshine, when then can, in their well loved garden brings back a feeling of love and pride that is hard to sustain elsewhere. 


But I feel I’m in danger of romanticising my dad’s life and work. The work is very hard. His weathered hands are carved with lines and roughened with the ritual removal of bits of thorn and twigs at the end of each day. These hands speak for themselves and the hard effort he expends. But they bring great rewards. 


With the end of March, the season of spring and new growth, this is no time for reflection for a gardener. My dad is too busy waking up his gardens after a long winter. But I’ve been reflecting on what his gardening can teach me. Sadly some of his more practical messages haven’t come through exactly as he might have hoped. I’m known as the plant murderer in my house. Full of enthusiasm but lethally haphazard with my plant nursing skills. I’ve had several casualties including a succulent, known for their indestructible nature and most recently a decapitated cactus. 


Maybe it’s because of this ineptitude that I’ve been drawn to some of the more abstract values his gardening can teach me, particularly about my own creative process. It seems I’m not the only one to make the same comparison. Janna Malamud Smith, in her exploration of the creative life, writes of her realisation of the nature of creative thinking after watching her mother tend her garden, ‘I posit that life is better when you possess a sustaining practice that holds our desire, demands your attention, and requires effort; a plot of ground that gratifies the wish to labour and create – and, by so doing, to rule over an imagined world of your own.’ My dad’s garden isn’t imaginary but I hope to be able to grow something tangible, writing or art, that is made with the same love and attention. My dad’s commitment and patience to his craft is something I would like to cultivate myself.

Screen Shot 2017-07-25 at 13.45.42.png

January 7, 2016

Back to work: the changing position of women in the workplace 

Originally published on She Works 

The first week of the New Year saw the vast majority of the UK’s workforce return to work. For the many women employed in businesses across the country, the numerous high profile examples of gender discrimination in the workplace throughout last year would be better left in 2015. Lets start with the gender pay gap, estimated by the Fawcett society to be at 14%. The reaction towards Rachel Reeves, branded a ‘stupid woman’ for announcing she would continue her political career while pregnant. Patronising tweets aimed at the England Women’s football team who were to resume their apparently more important role as ‘mothers, partners and daughters’ after reaching the semi-finals of the World Cup. I could go on and list the assumptions, prejudices and downright discrimination continually aimed at women in all professions. But I don’t want to. 


Instead, I want to find out firsthand if attitudes towards women in the workplace have progressed at all. Who better to ask than my own mum, who left school at 16 to work full time and has witnessed some of the landmark decisions in women’s employment history, The Sex Discrimination Act, the Equality Act and the election of the UK’s first female prime minister. My mum started her career as a distribution and logistics trainee, on the path to becoming senior manager of a busy warehouse processing orders and deliveries for stock across the country. 


She was the first woman to hold many a managerial role in this area at the first major company she worked for. At one point her official job title was even ‘foreman’ which for her, highlighted the momentous task ahead. The constant need to prove herself in a male dominated environment. 


I start with a general all encompassing question: what was it really like working in that environment? She responds immediately, detailing the most blatant acts of discrimination she faced. Under the company she initially worked for, as a single woman her mandatory pension contributions would be worth nothing. A single man on the other hand, could choose to designate these funds to whom ever he pleased. I hear of her refusal and later begrudging acceptance of such a discriminatory policy after threats of forced dismissal. 


Aside from these blatant acts of discrimination she also describes the hostility she faced as a female manager. A male finance director once remarked, “I’m not so sure I could do this, working for a woman. I suppose I could if I fancied her.” She gladly acknowledges that these attitudes for the most part, are no longer a reality. However, she asserts that this is due to women excelling in previously male dominated positions. Women in business are no longer a novelty. 


Whilst general attitudes towards women in the workplace may have changed, the problems women face with regards to maternity leave and securing affordable childcare remain a formidable barrier to their achievements. My mum remembers her commitment to her job being called into question when she could no longer attend company meetings. These meetings, that could have been rescheduled to suit every employees’ needs, were held all over the country and required extensive travelling at early hours of the morning making securing childcare impossible. Not content with dismissive comments, a boss once directly asked if my mum was pregnant in a meeting. My mum looks visibly uncomfortable at this memory, “But what do you say to that?”


These revelations are made all the more shocking by the fact that they are still common place. The laws around maternity and parental leave protect women, yet in many companies these laws are frequently viewed as open to interpretation or worse, as a “damned inconvenience” as someone once commented to my mum.


For further advances to be made my mum advocates not only further allocation and promotion of women in influential positions but a top led culture change. I wholeheartedly agree, having gained firsthand experience working at a major construction firm, another traditionally male dominated field. Whilst interviewing members of staff, despite my marked use of gender neutral pronouns to describe project managers or engineers many male members of staff exclusively used the male pronouns, ‘he’ and ‘him’. This was despite having women employed in both of these positions at their own company. Whilst this is incomparable to the open hostility my mum once faced, it is still concerning that women are still subconsciously excluded by people’s language. 


If in 2016, we learn from women’s first hand negative experiences in the workplace and implement steadfast commitments to a change in culture and childcare provisions, we may reach the position my mum hopes for me, “I hope that there is no reason for you to feel there is a gender difference. I want you to be completely and truly confident in your own abilities.” 

Features: News
Features: News
Features: News
bottom of page